Morsi v. Femer Paving Ltd.  O.J. No. 3960
This is an appeal from a trial decision that held York Region and Femer Paving Ltd each 25 % liable for a single car motor vehicle accident. The deceased was driving in excess of the speed limit, ignoring speed and construction signs and lost control of his vehicle when the road surface changed from fresh pavement to gravel.
The trial judge held that the plaintiff was 50% to blame for the accident, leaving the defendants with the other 50%.
York Region and Femer Paving appealed the decision.
York Region’s main submission was that after the trial Judge correctly stated the main issue and the test for resolving the issue …
“Whether at the material time Major Mackenzie drive was in a state of repair that was reasonable in the circumstances such that users of the road, exercising ordinary care, could travel upon it safely.”
… that he did not apply the test to the facts of the case.
“The evidence of Detective Stock and the Varicom tests as well as the evidence of Constable Herbert and the various engineering experts establishes that if Mark Morsi had operated his vehicle at the posted speed or even a speed modestly above it, he would have been able to successfully negotiate the transition area.”
The Ontario Court of Appeal found the driver to be reckless having accelerated to 117 km/h through a long curve and straightaway and ignoring two 60km/h speed signs, a reverse curve sign, a 40 km/h advisory sign and two construction signs. This was not a driver exercising ordinary care.
The appeal was allowed and the action by the driver’s family was dismissed.
- Alison McBurney